Skip to main content

Private Equity

Below is NZIF 2.0 implementation guidance for private equity. For approaches to achieving the asset level targets and more detailed guidance, please click on the NZIF 2.0 guide below.

Alignment targets

  • Asset alignment target: A percentage of invested capital (GPs), committed capital (LPs), or financed emissions to be ‘managed in alignment’ with net zero by 2030.
  • Engagement threshold target: Complete the specified engagement actions for all (100%) applicable private equity investments (see guidance).

Portfolio companies (PCs) can be deemed as “managed in alignment with net zero” when they meet the committed to aligning/ aligning/aligned/net zero criteria within the milestones outlined in the guidance.

As with all asset classes, the asset alignment target can be split into the five steps.

1. Setting the scope

Private equity investors are recommended to use the guidance for setting targets for buyout and growth equity investments, including related strategies such as co-investments, fund of funds, and secondaries.

New & existing funds – It is recommended investors establish approaches ahead of each new fund launch and that as many of their existing assets are managed in alignment with net zero ambitions.

Influence bands – Because of the different levels of influence GPs and LPs have, the assessing of alignment, the setting of targets, and approaches to delivering targets will differ. This guidance delineates between GPs’ and LPs’ approaches to target setting, based on the influence bands methodology. The influence bands establish objectives that are ambitious yet reflective of the practical circumstances that each investment type faces.

2. Assessing alignment

Investors are recommended to develop an approach to assessing the alignment of their private equity portfolios.

General partners

When developing their respective approach, GPs may want to consider the robustness of Paris-aligned targets (and exceptions), appropriate alignment milestones, cadence of assessment against criteria, acquisitions and buy-and-build strategies, and exits prior to alignment milestones.

GPs are recommended to assess PCs against NZIF’s alignment criteria.

Criteria underpinning alignment assessment
Key
  • Green ticks represent when a criterion is required to be fulfilled for a particular alignment category to be obtained.
Criteria
Committed to aligning
Aligning to a net zero pathway
Aligned to a net zero pathway
Achieving net zero

*Ambition: Long term goal for the company to be net zero emissions by 2050 or sooner.

Governance: Board oversight for climate risk and execution of climate strategy. Climate risk management and strategy are discussed by the Board at least once a year.

Disclosure: Annual disclosure to investors of scope 1, 2, and material scope 3* absolute GHG emissions. Public disclosure is best practice but not an expectation.

Targets: 5– to 10-year Paris-aligned GHG emissions reduction target (scope 1, 2, and material scope 3*).

Emissions performance: Cumulative YoY reduction meets or exceeds the linear annual reduction established as the target for scope 1, 2, and material scope 3* emissions.

Climate strategy: A proportionate plan is established that sets out the measures to deliver the target. For high impact material sectors, the strategy should be quantified and include CAPEX and OPEX required to achieve targets.

Company with emissions intensity required by the sector and regional pathway for 2050 and whose ongoing investment plan or business model will maintain this performance.

Fund vintage

PCs meeting the portfolio alignment criteria listed above, within milestones established to the right, are considered managed in alignment with net zero" and the capital invested in them will count towards coverage targets established by GPs.

Funds launched 2023-2029
1 year after deal close
2 years after deal close
By exit
Not required
Funds launched 2030-2050
1 year after deal close
2 years after deal close
4 years after deal close
No later than 2050

*Additional alignment criteria that a corporate within a high impact material sector needs to meet.

Limited partners

For the milestone years of 2030, 2040 and 2050, LPs are advised to assess and increase the amount of committed capital that GPs plan to manage in alignment with net zero.

On an annual basis, LPs should also calculate and disclose the percentage of invested capital being managed in alignment with net zero, as this reflects the reality of how investments are actually being managed. These calculations should be based on actual performance reported by GPs.

3. Setting the target

Once an approach to alignment has been established and a baseline assessment has been performed, investors are recommended to set:

  • For GPs, a percentage of invested capital or financed emissions to be ‘managed in alignment’ with net zero by 2030.
  • For LPs, a percentage of committed capital or financed emissions to be ‘managed in alignment’ with net zero by 2030.

An increased target is recommended to be set for 2040, and a target of 100% net zero by 2050.

Glide paths of target thresholds can be developed by an investor who should consider their respective influence band.

 

% of invested/committed capital managed in alignment with NZ by...
Asset classes
Band
2030
2040
2050
2060
DIRECT
  • GP buyout fund
  • GP growth fund
  • GP continuation fund
1a
80% Invested cap.
100% Invested cap.
100% Invested cap.
40% Invested capital
1b
30% Invested cap.
80% Invested cap.
100% Invested cap.
40% Invested capital
1c
20% Invested cap.
80% Invested cap.
100% Invested cap.
40% Invested capital
INDIRECT
  • LP investments in buyout, growth or continuation funds
  • LP co-investment
  • GP fund of funds
  • LP-led secondaries
2a
44% Committed cap.
100% Committed cap.
100% Invested cap
40% Invested capital
2b
33% Committed cap.
100% Committed cap.
100% Invested cap
40% Invested capital
2c
10% Committed cap.
80% Committed cap.
100% Invested cap.
40% Invested capital
Illustrative glide path thresholds
NZIF Targets

* LPs set their targets using committed capital because it is a metric they have more direct control over, and it more accurately reflects current actions taken. LPs are encouraged to simultaneously report current performance using invested capital., as this reflects how capital is actually deployed at a given time. Because of investment periods and the one-year window to achieve the first milestone, invested capital performance is expected to lag committed capital.

4. Delivering the target

GPs and LPs may utilise multiple levers to inform their net zero investment strategy and to help private equity assets transition towards meeting the alignment criteria and achieving the asset alignment target. This includes portfolio company and GP engagement, and integrating measures into portfolio assessment and management.

5. Monitoring the target

It is imperative GPs and LPs continuously monitor progress against their alignment targets. Recommendations are made for tracking progress and enhancing transparency through disclosure.

Case study

The Net Zero Investment Framework in action: Evenlode Investments

 

Download PDF reports

Useful resources

Explore further IIGCC resources which offer additional guidance or information which is complimentary to the use of NZIF.