Skip to main content

Asset Level Assessment & Targets

Helping investors shift the alignment of underlying holdings (assets) to be consistent with net zero goals and objectives.

Net zero target setting and implementation guidance is specific for each asset class, although the overall target structure remains the same and aggregation across asset classes remains possible.

Core action points

NZIF recommends the following actions for investors using the framework and considers them core:

  • Set the scope of assets within each asset class for alignment action.
  • Assess and disclose the baseline alignment of assets in scope, using the specified criteria relevant to each asset class.
  • Define and disclose which sectors have been considered as high impact.
  • Set and disclose short term targets and implement approaches to improve alignment of assets by asset class:
    • Asset alignment target: A 5-year target for increasing the % of AUM (or financed emissions) in material sectors that are ‘aligning’ or ‘aligned’ to a net zero pathway, or achieving net zero’.
    • Engagement threshold target: A minimum proportion of assets (based on scope 1 and 2 of financed emissions) are assessed as ‘achieving’ or ‘aligned’ to a net zero pathway, or are subject to engagement, increasing gradually over time. This should be accompanied by a description of the investor’s approach or strategy regarding engagement with assets with material scope 3 emissions.
Advanced action points

NZIF recommends the following advanced actions. These may initially be difficult when beginning to set and implement net zero targets (when attention is likely to be placed on implementing core action points), but would likely prove beneficial over the long term:

  • Disclose the science-based scenario(s) or pathway(s) used to guide target setting and assess the alignment of investments, including how scenarios meet key parameters, and critical assumptions used.
  • Disclose why any assets are not in scope under asset level targets, including the process, progress, and timeline for inclusion.
  • Regularly assess and disclose alignment of assets, including those not in scope.
  • Disclose metrics, targets and methodologies used to assess and track alignment of assets according to each asset class, and the extent to which these are consistent with NZIF's target setting methodology.
  • Disclose portfolio construction approaches implemented and/or products developed to facilitate allocation to products aligned with net zero objectives.
  • Disclose engagement, stewardship, and/or direct management actions undertaken in relation to the engagement threshold target, and key outcomes achieved.
  • Disclose where divestment or exclusion has been used, the rationale, and the extent to which this has been the means to achieve targets.
  • In addition to the engagement threshold based on scope 1 and 2 of financed emissions, disclose a ‘shadow’ engagement threshold metric for material scope 3 of financed emissions, to indicate the proportion of assets (based on material scope 3) that are assessed as ‘achieving’ or ‘aligned’ to a net zero pathway or are subject to engagement.

Across all asset classes

Whilst guidance differs across asset classes covered by NZIF, this guide sets out a five-step process that investors may wish to consider to support them to develop, deliver and monitor an asset alignment target that can be applied across all asset classes.

  1. Set the scope according to NZIF’s recommendations, to confirm which assets should be considered within scope of target setting.
  2. Assess the alignment of existing and new assets using NZIF’s alignment criteria.
  3. Set targets to increase the alignment of assets to net zero in the short term.
  4. Deliver the target by implementing a strategy that utilises the many levers at an investor’s disposal.
  5. Monitor the target to ensure sufficient progress is made and targets can be updated when necessary.

This paper further provides guidance on setting an engagement threshold target and developing engagement strategies to help achieve the target.

Setting the scope

Sectors

Sectors considered “material” to the net zero transition are defined as those in NACE code categories A-H and J-L, are recommended to be considered for assessment High impact sectors (CA100+ or TPI companies) are required to meet more of the alignment criteria to be considered ‘aligned’.

 

Scope 3
  • Alignment: The asset alignment criteria and subsequent assessment are recommended to cover scope 1, 2 and material scope 3 emissions
  • Engagement: The target recommended to be based on % of scope 1 and 2 financed emissions, but should be accompanied by a description of the investor’s approach or strategy.

Assessing alignment

Assessing alignment

To set alignment targets, investors will need to undertake an assessment of the current and past alignment of assets against the alignment criteria set out in NZIF to categorise assets against NZIF’s maturity scale.

Criteria
  • Ambition
  • Targets
  • Emissions performance
  • Disclosure
  • Decarbonisation plan
  • Capital allocation alignment
  • Climate policy engagement
  • Climate governance
  • Just transition
  • Climate risk and accounts
Maturity scale
  • Achieving net zero
  • Aligned to a net zero pathway
  • Aligning to a net zero pathway
  • Committed to aligning
  • Not aligning

Setting the target

Setting targets

Investors are recommended to set a short term target for increasing the % of AUM or financed emissions that can be considered ‘aligned’ to a net zero pathway or achieving net zero. In the case of sovereign bonds, this is based on % of sovereign bonds allocation to issuers that are categorised as ‘aligned’ or ‘achieving net zero’.

 

Using AUM or financed emissions to set asset alignment targets

It is important investors recognise the implications of whichever metric is selected to set the target. Setting the asset alignment target based on AUM can avoid the issue of declining financed emissions proportions over time, as a greater proportion of assets can be considered “aligned”. Selecting financed emissions as the metric may support investors in prioritising efforts to increase the net zero alignment of the highest emitting assets within the portfolio.

You can see illustrative examples of how increased alignment might correlate with AUM and financed emissions in the guidance document.

Delivering the target

Investor levers to increase portfolio alignment

Across all asset classes, portfolio construction, capital allocation decisions and engagement and stewardship are key levers to support the achievement of the asset alignment target. Guidance for implementing these levers, among others, are detailed for each asset class.

Monitoring the target

Disclosure

To ensure targets remain robust and are updated appropriately, and progress can be communicated clearly with relevant stakeholders, investors are recommended to provide certain backward looking disclosures relating to how asset alignment has been achieved.

 

Attribution analysis

Investors can perform attribution analysis to understand the drivers of changes to the proportion of assets classified along the alignment maturity scale. This can inform net zero strategies, guide engagement and enhance transparency. See step 6 of the portfolio decarbonisation reference objective for listed equities, which provides guidance on undertaking attribution analysis for portfolio emissions changes; many of the drivers recommended for decarbonisation assessment below are relevant for alignment assessment.

 

Sectors

Sectors considered “material” to the net zero transition are defined as those in NACE code categories A-H and J-L, are recommended to be considered for assessment High impact sectors (CA100+ or TPI companies) are required to meet more of the alignment criteria to be considered ‘aligned’.

 

Scope 3
  • Alignment: The asset alignment criteria and subsequent assessment are recommended to cover scope 1, 2 and material scope 3 emissions
  • Engagement: The target recommended to be based on % of scope 1 and 2 financed emissions, but should be accompanied by a description of the investor’s approach or strategy.
Assessing alignment

To set alignment targets, investors will need to undertake an assessment of the current and past alignment of assets against the alignment criteria set out in NZIF to categorise assets against NZIF’s maturity scale.

Criteria
  • Ambition
  • Targets
  • Emissions performance
  • Disclosure
  • Decarbonisation plan
  • Capital allocation alignment
  • Climate policy engagement
  • Climate governance
  • Just transition
  • Climate risk and accounts
Maturity scale
  • Achieving net zero
  • Aligned to a net zero pathway
  • Aligning to a net zero pathway
  • Committed to aligning
  • Not aligning
Setting targets

Investors are recommended to set a short term target for increasing the % of AUM or financed emissions that can be considered ‘aligned’ to a net zero pathway or achieving net zero. In the case of sovereign bonds, this is based on % of sovereign bonds allocation to issuers that are categorised as ‘aligned’ or ‘achieving net zero’.

 

Using AUM or financed emissions to set asset alignment targets

It is important investors recognise the implications of whichever metric is selected to set the target. Setting the asset alignment target based on AUM can avoid the issue of declining financed emissions proportions over time, as a greater proportion of assets can be considered “aligned”. Selecting financed emissions as the metric may support investors in prioritising efforts to increase the net zero alignment of the highest emitting assets within the portfolio.

You can see illustrative examples of how increased alignment might correlate with AUM and financed emissions in the guidance document.

Investor levers to increase portfolio alignment

Across all asset classes, portfolio construction, capital allocation decisions and engagement and stewardship are key levers to support the achievement of the asset alignment target. Guidance for implementing these levers, among others, are detailed for each asset class.

Disclosure

To ensure targets remain robust and are updated appropriately, and progress can be communicated clearly with relevant stakeholders, investors are recommended to provide certain backward looking disclosures relating to how asset alignment has been achieved.

 

Attribution analysis

Investors can perform attribution analysis to understand the drivers of changes to the proportion of assets classified along the alignment maturity scale. This can inform net zero strategies, guide engagement and enhance transparency. See step 6 of the portfolio decarbonisation reference objective for listed equities, which provides guidance on undertaking attribution analysis for portfolio emissions changes; many of the drivers recommended for decarbonisation assessment below are relevant for alignment assessment.

 

Asset classes:

Listed Equity & Corporate Fixed Income

Sovereign Bonds

Real Estate

Infrastructure

Private Equity

Private Debt

Download PDF reports