IIGCC Insights

Physical risk data: an ocean of information, a desert of knowledge

Written by Anne Chataigné | May 27, 2026 10:08:22 AM

Investors face a paradox: more physical climate risk data than ever, but limited clarity on how it should inform financial materiality, investment decision-making and adaptation and resilience (A&R). This Insight explores why abundant data is not yet translating into actionable knowledge.

This piece was co-authored with Lucia Graham-Wood (Senior Engagement Specialist – Banks, IIGCC)

As physical risks intensify, investors are trying to assess exposure and vulnerability across portfolios and assets, but are held back by inconsistent methodologies, patchy coverage, and differing interpretations of risk. These challenges make it harder to compare results and prioritise engagement.

Ahead of the IIGCC Summit 2026, which kicks off London Climate Action Week on Monday 22 June – this Insight sets out:

  • Why this gap persists
  • What investors are grappling with in practice, and how data providers could respond
  • How to turn physical climate risk data into investment appraisals and engagement outcomes

These themes will be explored further at the Summit in a members-only workshop for data providers, portfolio managers and stewardship teams. The session will introduce a new IIGCC engagement tool on adaptation and resilience and preview investor expectations for physical climate risk data providers – offering a practical space to share feedback and move from data to decision making.

From awareness to accountability

Physical climate risks are no longer a distant concern – they are already affecting asset values, cash flows, insurability and long-term returns.

For investors, the challenge is not only technical. It is also systemic: how resilience is incentivised and valued remains unsolved.

Expectations are also evolving. Stakeholders increasingly expect investors not only to understand exposure, but to demonstrate how they are responding to and managing vulnerabilities – through investment decisions, engagement and stewardship, and real-world outcomes.

Against this backdrop, the focus is shifting from analysis to action. Engagement is emerging as a key lever to strengthen understanding, improve disclosure and support more resilient outcomes across portfolios.

Turning data into decisions

The central challenge for investors is turning complex – and often conflicting – climate data into clear, financially material insights that can inform valuation, pricing and risk management.

Investors face several practical barriers:

  • Data gaps and inconsistencies: Limited or uneven coverage at company and asset level makes it difficult to assess exposure and resilience comprehensively.
  • Low transparency: Opaque methodologies and assumptions reduce confidence in outputs.
  • Diverging models: While investors recognise that divergence is healthy in a competitive market, different approaches can produce widely varying results, complicating comparison and decision making.
  • Weak incentives to disclose: Companies often have limited incentives to disclose physical climate risks if doing so may expose them to penalties.

This creates a fundamental tension: investors need to act now despite imperfect data, but still lack sufficiently disclosed, decision-useful information from companies and assets.

 In response, investors are using engagement with companies more systematically to test assumptions and build a clearer picture of risk and resilience, as well as pushing for better incentives for disclosure and resilience planning. In practice, this helps bridge the gap between imperfect data and real-world decisions.

Building the tools for action

The priority is clear: physical climate risk analysis must translate into financially material, actionable insights – supported by both robust data and effective engagement.

IIGCC is supporting this shift from data to action by focusing on three areas:

A key emphasis is the complementarity between data and engagement: data can help identify potential risks, while engagement can validate, contextualise and support action.

For investors, this means embedding physical risk into core decision-making processes, strengthening internal capability to interpret outputs, and using engagement to test resilience in practice.

How the IIGCC Summit 2026 workshop can support investors

At the IIGCC Summit 2026, our workshop will explore how to translate physical climate risk data into practical investment and engagement outcomes. It will examine what “decision-useful” data looks like in practice, and how investors can apply it at different stages of the investment process.

A central theme will be how to navigate inherent uncertainty – moving forward despite data limitations and using engagement to strengthen understanding and improve company and asset responses.

Through focused breakout discussions, participants will explore:

  • How physical risk data is used at portfolio and asset level
  • How engagement can support more effective decision-making
  • What system-level enablers are needed

The aim is to identify practical next steps to improve both data use and engagement effectiveness, and to align on priority actions for the next 12–18 months.

 

Hear from JP Morgan’s Dr. Sarah B Kapnick, IPCC’s Sir Jim Skea and S&P’s Francesco d’Avack at the IIGCC Summit 2026 – as we make sense of climate in an age of rupture and competing priorities, risks and opportunities.