IIGCC Insights

Just Transition in net zero strategies: Beyond risk, towards value creation

Written by Elena Vydrine | Apr 2, 2026 9:29:42 AM

Integrating just transition can strengthen net zero strategies by enhancing portfolio resilience and reducing risk. This insight highlights why it is increasingly important and how IIGCC’s guidance supports practical integration across portfolios.

Just transition is central to credible net zero portfolios – not only for the value it can create through a stronger talent pipeline, more bankable projects and enhancing portfolio resilience. But, also because ignoring it increases systemic, operational and regulatory risks that threaten market stability, project delivery and compliance.

By treating the just transition as both a risk factor and a value‑creation driver that supports long-term growth drivers, investors are better positioned to deliver their net zero goals with stronger support from communities and external stakeholders, fewer delays, and more inclusive and investable transition pathways.

New Guidance on ‘Just transition: Supplement to the Net Zero Investment Framework’ explores this full spectrum of risks and opportunities and provides practical levers and decision-useful tools for integrating these considerations into investment strategies.

The Guidance further simplifies integration by identifying clear touch points across investor decision-making and highlights three recommended areas of action, supported by real-world examples.

But why does just transition matter for investors?

The global net zero transition poses a challenge of uneven distribution of gains and losses across regions, sectors, and communities. This itself underscores the need for a ‘just transition’ – a transition that seeks to balance climate ambition with fairness, ensuring decent work, equity and resilience for those most affected by the structural change.

Integrating just transition considerations strengthens efforts to manage a wide range of risks and protect long-term returns, and unlock investable and inclusive decarbonisation pathways. It also safeguards long-term value by:

  • Enhancing social acceptance and community support
  • Reducing litigation and reputational exposure
  • Ensuring alignment with evolving policy frameworks

At the same time, it positions investors to capitalise on place-based transition opportunities, clean energy deployment, sustainable infrastructure and inclusive workforce development – all of which can materially enhance portfolio resilience and long-term returns.

Additional opportunities include:

  • Reducing execution barriers by improving social acceptance and workforce readiness, helping avoid delays, cancellations and cost overruns.
  • Expanding access to capital, including concessional and blended finance that improve project bankability and crowd in public–private capital.
  • Enhancing policy durability, supporting socially robust transition pathways that reduce the risk of policy reversal and strengthen investment certainty.
  • Strengthening supply‑chain resilience through fair and well‑supported labour practices across transition‑enabling industries.

The table outlines financial risks associated with inaction on the just transition

How to integrate just transition into existing net zero strategies?

The Net Zero Investment Framework (NZIF 2.0) incorporates just transition into its multi-criteria maturity scale under the ‘asset-level assessments and targets’ component, drawing on resources such as the Climate Action 100+ Disclosure Framework.

The Guidance builds on this by laying out six clear touchpoints across investor decision-making – from Governance & Strategy, Objectives, Strategic Asset Allocation, and more.

Different touchpoints for investors to integrate just transition into their individual net zero strategies

Based on the six touchpoints, we highlight three recommended action areas, which are further illustrated through nine real-world examples.

1. Setting internal direction and portfolio structure.
Rather than prescribe a single definition, the Guidance identifies seven common themes that give investors the flexibility to adopt the approach that best fits their context – turning the lack of one definition into a strength. This supports differentiated expectations for companies across diverse markets and embedding social considerations into governance, strategy, and risk assessment processes.

In practice, this includes ensuring governance structures recognise just transition principles, aligning internal objectives with fair share emissions reductions, and embedding social considerations into investment mandates, strategic asset allocation decisions, and risk management frameworks. A growing set of metrics can support internal alignment and help shape credible capital allocation approaches.

2. Shifting alignment of assets to meet targets.
Once strategic direction is set, investors can engage and work with companies, asset managers, financial institutions and Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) to explore how just transition considerations can be reflected in investment decisions and stewardship.

This may include incorporating social and workforce transition factors into investment due diligence, applying sector‑specific expectations to high‑impact issuers, and integrating just transition into asset‑level transition plans, and using context-specific indicators in investment decisions. Investors are already strengthening engagement on associated social risks and exploring inclusive financing structures. You can find out more in the case studies.

The action area also involves assessing project-level deliverability risks – such as delays, cancellations or increased CapEx – and recognising where just transition considerations are most material, including infrastructure, utilities and emerging markets.

3. Influencing the external environment.
Real‑economy progress requires an enabling external ecosystem. Investors may wish to engage communities, and encourage transparent processes such as Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC). This is increasingly important as climate‑related litigation expands into areas of social equity, human rights and community engagement.

Beyond this, investors can work with policymakers, regulators, and multilateral institutions to shape national transition strategies that embed just transition principles and remove barriers to scaling socially inclusive climate investments. Engagement with industry associations, data providers, service providers and broader ecosystem actors further strengthen the quality and consistency of just transition practice.

These themes and additional investor case studies will be explored further in our upcoming IIGCC webinar on integrating the just transition into net zero strategies.

 

Understanding strategic importance

For institutional investors, the just transition is not an optional add‑on to climate strategy; it is a core determinant of execution feasibility, policy durability, and market‑wide stability. Integrating just transition considerations helps mitigate systemic, operational, and regulatory risks while enhancing social acceptance – a foundational condition for resilient portfolios and credible net zero pathways.

By embedding these principles in governance, objectives and targets setting, asset allocation, engagement, and advocacy, investors can protect value and capitalise on investable opportunities as part of their fiduciary duty.

 Be the first to access our working groups, resources and guidance as an IIGCC member. Interested in finding out more? Get in touch today.